Seems like we have pretty good agreement here. Adding them to the list. On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:14 AM STRASSNER, BRYAN <bs4939@att.com> wrote:
+1 as well – I’ve worked directly with both, and I would trust them to make good decisions.
*From:* Mark Burnett <mark.m.burnett@gmail.com> *Sent:* Friday, August 24, 2018 11:11 AM *To:* MEADOWS, ALAN <am240k@att.com> *Cc:* MONTEIRO, FELIPE C <fm577c@att.com>; airship-discuss@lists.airshipit.org
*Subject:* Re: [Airship-discuss] Core Nomination - Matt McEuen and Sean Eagan
+1, I agree they would both be great cores.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:15 PM MEADOWS, ALAN <am240k@att.com> wrote:
+1
*From:* MONTEIRO, FELIPE C *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2018 9:48 AM *To:* airship-discuss@lists.airshipit.org *Subject:* Re: [Airship-discuss] Core Nomination - Matt McEuen and Sean Eagan
****Security Advisory:* This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
+1
I nominate Sean Eagan (sean.eagan@att.com) and Matt McEuen ( matt.mceuen@att.com) as cores for Airship. Both are active with the code base and have shown good understanding of at least parts of the platform as well as conservative judgment on approving changes.
Scott Hussey
sthussey
_______________________________________________ Airship-discuss mailing list Airship-discuss@lists.airshipit.org http://lists.airshipit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/airship-discuss <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.airshipit.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_airship-2Ddiscuss&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=lg0Gw5OaH7fHGAPxU-Bffg&m=nvuzcdGDT0UuWdYcpdZJ_jfYzr5T_-NxmSOe3PzVARo&s=-RYp37SgFe0FUMnkAY13oOaPqdirVfwbkwUTl4G-NN4&e=>
_______________________________________________ Airship-discuss mailing list Airship-discuss@lists.airshipit.org http://lists.airshipit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/airship-discuss