Thanks for the detail explanation. :) As you wrote, we can certainly see and discuss the best combination of call schedule along the way. One thing though, for Thursday call, 12am - 1:30am is really difficult for us. 11pm - 12:30am would be more realistic scenairo. Through the few next design calls, let's figure out how much we need to be invoved in Thursday discussion. If it turns out we need to participate in Thursday call, I will sincerely ask slight time adjustment. :) Thanks! Jaesuk Ahn, Ph.D. Software Labs, SK Telecom 2019년 5월 9일 (목) 오전 2:13, PACHECO, RODOLFO J <rp2723@att.com>님이 작성:
Jaesuk
The UTC time zone for the meetings makes sense, will is that
As far as the design call I believe the expectation is that after a couple of weeks we will probable start splintering into smaller groups as we properly define the work areas in more detail
We will have the 2 calls +++ as needed
We can discuss which areas of work are dealt with on which calls, should be ok to use the call that better suits APAC time zones for whichever topics you guys and others from that time zone will be collaborating on.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 7, 2019, at 10:13 PM, Jaesuk Ahn <bluejay.ahn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Just to be clear on meeting time, I suggest meeting time should be based on UTC, not on any local time, to avoid regional specific summer time confusion. Having said that, meeting schedule proposal would be - Thursday 15:00 UTC ( 11:00 AM EST/ 10:00 AM CST / 8:00 AM PST/ 12:00 AM UTC +9 (Asia)/ 3-4 PM UTC+1/2 (Europe)) - Tuesday 13:00 UTC (9:00 AM EST/ 8:00 AM CST / 6:00 AM PST/ 10:00 PM UTC +9 (Asia)/ 1-2 PM UTC+1/2 (Europe)
Q1. Is this "2 calls per week" a final decision? Q2. If we do twice a week, it seems like Thursday meeting is the main one, especially from the number of "+1"s. Do we have any idea on how we can synchronize two meetings, how we want to run these two meetings?
Anyway, I voted for the calls length.
Regards,
Jaesuk Ahn
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:51 AM PACHECO, RODOLFO J <rp2723@att.com> wrote:
RESENDING -> ISSUES with the PREVIOUS DOODLE (confusing and not working)
At the PTG we had the discussion for the Design Call Times/and Number of Days.
The following options where proposed at the PTG
· Design Call evolution
- Move to at least 2 calls a week (Suggested)
§ Thursday - 11:00 AM EST/ 10:00 AM CST / 8:00 AM PST/ 12:00 AM UTC +9 (Asia)/ 3-4 PM UTC+1/2 (Europe)+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
§ Tuesday - 9:00 AM EST/ 8:00 AM CST / 6:00 AM PST/ 10:00 PM UTC +9 (Asia)/ 1-2 PM UTC+1/2 (Europe)+1+1
- Extend length of the calls?
§ Remain 60 mins+1
§ Extend 90 mins +1
The key question remaining is the length of the calls.
Please vote here for Calls length.
Ignore the Tuesday/Thursday May date’s, all I am interested in deciding is the length of the calls at this point.
https://doodle.com/poll/wbdwym6x4dqnhe6f <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doodle.com_poll_wbdwym6x4dqnhe6f&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Bjzj_RciGLj21LnNXoD5dw&m=uFeROHTwM9h-vBzRCvODsnjhg027PMBCrHWqPu6E1R4&s=L8Htva1Psai6O8oyJOrNgBgl5UIS2lvnmxlngj7FyaU&e=>
Will close this voting Sunday May 12 at 12 AM EST.
Will send an updated invite in the mailing list afterwards.
Reminder we will have the Design Call Thursday May 9 at 11 EST as per usual.
Regards
*Rodolfo Pacheco*
*Home/Office* 732 5337671 _______________________________________________ Airship-discuss mailing list Airship-discuss@lists.airshipit.org http://lists.airshipit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/airship-discuss <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.airshipit.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_airship-2Ddiscuss&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Bjzj_RciGLj21LnNXoD5dw&m=uFeROHTwM9h-vBzRCvODsnjhg027PMBCrHWqPu6E1R4&s=WJRG7mWSVUWD7ZVfvo9X7kL8H4ANSuPDTIo9mWT9D3w&e=>
-- *Jaesuk Ahn*, Ph.D. Software R&D Center, SK Telecom